Working with children in need

Working with babyren in needThis appellative depart explain the role of a Local Authority (LA) Social proletarian (SW) when running(a) with children in need and their families, and those in need of safeguarding and bulwark, allow also explain the main role of children and families sw and reasons why they would be involved. Furthermore it will discuss the importance of multidisciplinary working identify different forms of abuse, their impact and alleviation. In line with evidence based practice, the Children Act 1989 sections 17 and 47 will be analysed as intervention methodsIts important as a sw to utilise an understanding of theories of homophile growth and teaching to understand the various stages of development that the children are undergoing, before making any decision of safeguarding. Children in need whitethorn have faced extraordinary experiences in their early lives that may get word their physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development. Safeg uarding is defined by (HM Government 2013) as the action we take to promote the welfare of children and cling to them from harm. Child defense is defined by RCPCH, (2006) as the process of protecting individual children identified as either suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm as a result of abuse or neglect.Section 17 (10) of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) defines a child in need as a child who is marvellous to achieve or maintain, or to have the opportunity of achieving or maintaining, a reasonable standard of health or development without the provision for him/her of services by a local authority or his/her health or development is likely to be significantly impaired, or further impaired without the provision for him/her of such services or he/she is disabled (H M Government, 1989, section 17) gives LA duties and powers to yield services for children in need and their families Part 111 (Sec17 (1)).When a referral is made, LA is agonistic to consider initial en quiries within 10 days. This is to find out what is happening to a child and decide which action should be taken to protect the child as set in the CA1989 S47 of Protection of Children (Brammer 2013). This guide draws on all professionals to work together to promote childrens welfare and ensures families are provided with much necessary resources.In some historic children cases these processes werent upheld and lead to the death of children like Baby P and Victoria Climbie. Lord Laming ((Laming and Office, 2003)) stated that communication has played a major role in successes and failures of the system. He also made recommendations that will ignite working together in terms multi-disciplinary teams working together education sharing Connolly and Ward, (2008) suggested It is good practice to consider childrens rights to protection as of paramount duty and at the same time work in confederation with their parents unless doing so would harm them.The Framework for Assessment of Childr en (Figure 1) in Need and their Families (DoH, 2000) emphasises the use of an ecological salute to identify the child within the environment and offers a holistic approach (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). It enables professionals to identify systems affecting a child, the most and the social forces impacting on his lifespan in that locationfore, resulting in interventions being applied where they are needed most. An ecological approach looks at people, families, cultures, communities, policies and identifies and intervenes upon strengths and weaknesses in the transactional processes between these systems (Greene and Greene, 2008). Figure1 (Department of Health 2000, p.1)Living conditions may result in disturbed nights, which can lead to strain and tiredness (Hazel, 2002). Similarly, inadequate lodging may cause parents anxiety and affect their capacity to care for the children. Therefore, a sw could use their powers to make a referral for families to acquire an adequate accommodation. Acc ording to lamella and Jack (2007) the ecological theory is important in the development of holistic approaches to safeguarding children. Its strengths are that it focuses on individuals as part and incorporating other systems, so it integrates social with psychological elements of practice however, it is criticised for assuming that everything fits into a social articulate (Payne, 2009).A SW is expected to consider human rights issues when completing any assessment. In the community theres a whole variety of conventions e.g. ethnic minorities, women, disabled people, homo inners children just to mention a few. Professionals are required to uphold and defend the rights of individuals whilst seeking to meet their needs and this are all governed by The Human Rights Act 1998. Brayne Shoot, (2010) said the act has also heavily influenced the Disability Discriminations Act, (2005) and Equality Act, (2006 2010)Welbourne (2012) said SW is a profession that engages with peoples lives at all levels, from the practical to the deeply personal. Lord Laming (2003) said child protection is everyones business, and its important that SW, police, and health workers take the lead role for the procedures and processes that protect children from harm.The CA 1989 sec 47(1) places a duty on LA to investigate when they are informed that a child who lives or is found in their areais the subject of an emergency protection orderis in police custodyhave reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives, or is found in the area is suffering, or is likely to suffer a significant harmLA will conduct an initial child protection conference that consists of all professionals including the child, family members. This is a partnership aimed at setting out plans in place for both family and the group members. They will meet within 10 days after the initial conference and at least 8 weeks after that. The plan will be considering day to day details of the care plan and to put it into practice. After the case has been opened, implemented and put into practice, a Review Child Protection scale Conference is called to review and assess the progress of the case. The first review is held within 3 months of the initial conference and at least six months after that. A SW will always aim to achieve results and return the child to their parents.Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006 (Department of Health) has 5 identifiable forms of abuse as neglect, physical, emotional, sexual and domestic abuses, and the latter has been recently added and recognised in its own right. Coleen L (2003) suggested that Negligence can include behaviours that receipt, fraudulently misrepresentation, defamation of character act, violation of human rights, malicious prosecution.Maureen OLoughlin and Steve OLoughlin (2008) suggested that Parents have a central role in their childrens welfare and protection from harm, and should therefore be included in all decisions and actions taken by professional s Parents have their complex needs as well, some abuse drugs and alcohol and generally have low self-esteem. If parents deny sw access to a child and theres a possibility of a greater risk of life or likelihood of serious harm, LA will apply for the Child Assessment Order sec43 CA 1989 when they considering any kind of contact, LA would have reasons to suspect concerns with development, welfare and health of a child. This order will only last 8 days without extension. Emergency Protection Order (EPO) under S44 of the CA 1989. It can last for 8 days with the pickaxe to extend for 7 more days. Brayne Carr, (2010) suggested that It is important that any discussions with children are done in a way that minimises the distress and maximises the likelihood of them providing clear and accurate accounts The children may be looked after by the LA with parental agreement (Children Act, 1989, sec. 20. A child may only be kept in police protection however, for 72 hours (Brammer 2006). Other or der available is Recovery order sec50, will be applied if a child under PPO or EPO is removed from the creditworthy applicant. Police can recover the child and return them to the place of safety.SW has an obligation to conduct themselves ethically, engaging in ethical decisionmaking, including partnership working with service users and this was quoted by The computer code of Ethics for Social Work (BASW, 2011). Social work is a very privileged profession, they draw up conclusions and judgement on what they observe and hear. Hence its necessary to develop an inner skill not to use prejudice in any engagement. Empowerment has been understood as a paradigm within anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice (Lishman, 2007) and can be implemented through partnership working, which is a key social work value (Thompson, 2009).This assignment has shown how and why a sw would intervene when a child becomes in need. It also discussed the LAs responsibility for children in need and their families. Aim is to protect and safeguard children from harm by forming partnership working with families assist in providing alternative services to promote their welfare. The assignment drew up on germane(predicate) legislation that ensure welfare of a child remains paramount, also challenges all professionals to collaborate in a systematic manner. Children have been let ingest in the past and Every Child Matters ensured it is everyones responsibility to ensure that their health and development is secured. This reiterates the importance of SWs impact into the system, drawn from Code of Ethics sws should always challenge any discrimination, recognise diversity, always distribute resources to those in need, challenge unjust policies and practices and work in solidarity. In conclusion a sw would not be aware if a child is in need or requires protection however, the facts in this essay provide a sensible method of judgement on whether a child is in need or at risk of significant ha rm.